[FFmpeg-cvslog] r9307 - in trunk/libavcodec: dsputil.c mpegvideo.c

Jan Knutar jknutar
Thu Jun 14 22:47:59 CEST 2007


On Thursday 14 June 2007 11:44, diego wrote:

> -#ifdef HAVE_MLIB
> +#elif defined(HAVE_MLIB)
>      dsputil_init_mlib(c, avctx);
> -#endif
> -#ifdef ARCH_SPARC
> +#elif defined(ARCH_SPARC)
>     dsputil_init_vis(c,avctx);
> -#endif

Ok, I benchmarked in mplayer with a svn snapshot having a lavc before r9307.
4 variants, no accel, vis accel, mlib, vis+mlib. I compiled with --enable-mlib
and without, and then modified libavcodec/sparc/dsputil_vis.c to enable/disable
vis.

I used -ac dummy -ao null -vo x11 -vf format=bgr24 -benchmark -quiet file.avi
3 runs each, the best result of each below. The difference between runs was <0.25s.
The test file's resolution was 320x240, the video codec used in it is lavc's mpeg4.
2212 frames. CPU UltraSparc IIe 650Mhz.

The VC value is most meaningful, I guess.

no accel
BENCHMARKs: VC:  16.545s VO:  22.799s A:   0.000s Sys:   0.710s =   40.053s

vis-only:
BENCHMARKs: VC:  15.364s VO:  22.584s A:   0.000s Sys:   0.716s =   38.664s

mlib-only:
BENCHMARKs: VC:  13.273s VO:  22.740s A:   0.000s Sys:   0.905s =   36.917s

mlib+vis:
BENCHMARKs: VC:  12.308s VO:  22.789s A:   0.000s Sys:   0.689s =   35.786s


It would be interesting to compare the areas where vis and mlib overlap, too. Or see
if there's any significant difference if you change the init order.




More information about the ffmpeg-cvslog mailing list