[FFmpeg-cvslog] r10970 - trunk/doc/faq.texi

diego subversion
Fri Nov 9 15:05:43 CET 2007


Author: diego
Date: Fri Nov  9 15:05:43 2007
New Revision: 10970

Log:
Clarify Visual Studio FAQ.


Modified:
   trunk/doc/faq.texi

Modified: trunk/doc/faq.texi
==============================================================================
--- trunk/doc/faq.texi	(original)
+++ trunk/doc/faq.texi	Fri Nov  9 15:05:43 2007
@@ -360,10 +360,10 @@ It depends. If your compiler is C99-comp
 it are likely to be welcome if they do not pollute the source code
 with @code{#ifdef}s related to the compiler.
 
- at section Microsoft Visual C++ produces many errors.
+ at section Is Microsoft Visual C++ supported?
 
-Microsoft Visual C++ is not compliant to the C standard and does not support
-the inline assembly used in FFmpeg.
+No. Microsoft Visual C++ is not compliant to the C99 standard and does
+not - among other things - support the inline assembly used in FFmpeg.
 If you wish - for whatever weird reason - to use MSVC++ for your
 project then you can link the MSVC++ code with libav* as long as
 you compile the latter with a working C compiler. For more information, see
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ documentation.
 
 There have been efforts to make FFmpeg compatible with MSVC++ in the
 past. However, they have all been rejected as too intrusive, especially
-since MinGW does the job perfectly adequately. None of the core developers
+since MinGW does the job adequately. None of the core developers
 work with MSVC++ and thus this item is low priority. Should you find
 the silver bullet that solves this problem, feel free to shoot it at us.
 




More information about the ffmpeg-cvslog mailing list