[FFmpeg-cvslog] r10562 - trunk/doc/TODO
Sun Sep 30 22:29:39 CEST 2007
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 03:27:39PM -0400, Compn wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:32:54 +0200, Michael Niedermayer scribed:
> >On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 01:21:20PM +0200, Vitor Sessak wrote:
> >> Hi
> >> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 12:42:36PM +0200, Vitor Sessak wrote:
> >> > [...]
> >> >>> and if anyone is stupid enough to implement these they will just
> >> >>> end at a "we dont want that" on ffmpeg-dev
> >> >>> and thats hugely wasted time for the poor author ...
> >> >> That's my point of why you should care about this list...
> >> >
> >> > i dont want to maintain 3 todo lists
> >> There is no use in having 3 lists, maintained or not.
> >> > if you think its important (and i dont disagree), you can
> >> > maintain the wiki one
> >> I'm not thinking of maintaining it. I want to empty it (move the
> >> items to other lists or just deleting them) and them delete it. Now
> >> the question: the useful items should be moved to the bugtracker or
> >> to doc/TODO?
> >id say bugtracker
> what about moving doc/TODO to bugtracker as well?
yes you can do that if you like to
though some points of the todo list are unclear and iam not sure what we
should do with them, maybe move them over and mark as invalid :)
also theres still the tracker at sourceforge with 94 feature requests
and 26 bugs these as well should be moved over (minus trash and duplicates)
after that ill close the sf trackers
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
it is not once nor twice but times without number that the same ideas make
their appearance in the world. -- Aristotle
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-cvslog