[FFmpeg-cvslog] [propchange]: r14131 - svn:log
Wed Jul 9 19:39:07 CEST 2008
Reimar D?ffinger wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 04:40:54PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>> diego wrote:
>> > Author: diego
>> > Revision: 14131
>> > Property Name: svn:log
>> > Action: modified
>> > Property diff:
>> > --- old property value
>> > +++ new property value
>> > @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
>> > -One bit fields should probably be unsigned. Unfortunately, it is left up to
>> > the compiler on how one bit fields are treated. gcc treats one bit fields as
>> > signed and allows for the
>> > --funsigned-field parameter. Other compilers (like Sun C) treat one bit fields
>> > as unsigned no matter what.
>> > +One bit fields should probably be unsigned. Unfortunately, it is left up
>> One-bit. We've discussed this before.
> Actually IMO there is a "bit" missing, i.e. "one bit fields" should
> be "one-bit bitfields" or probably better "one-bit bit-fields" (the
> later one is how bit-field is written in the spec).
I would prefer "bitfields" to "bit-fields", as the former is IME
standard usage and to my eye more normal. I might also disagree that the
additional "bit" would be necessary at all, but I don't feel strongly
about the matter.
Warning: Simply because I argue an issue does not mean I agree with any
side of it.
Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny.
More information about the ffmpeg-cvslog