[FFmpeg-cvslog] r13444 - in trunk: libavcodec/acelp_vectors.h libavcodec/cook.c libavcodec/dnxhdenc.c libavcodec/h264.c libavcodec/qdm2.c libavcodec/qtrle.c libavcodec/vc1.c libavcodec/vp3.c libavcodec/vqavideo.c libavfilter/avfilter.h libavformat/avidec.c libavformat/ipmovie.c libavformat/nsvdec.c libavformat/rl2.c libavformat/rmenc.c

[Diego Biurrun]

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 05:30:02PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 03:06:35PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 03:00:49PM +0200, Benoit Fouet wrote:
> > > Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 01:39:48PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> > > >   
> > > >> Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> writes:
> > > >>     
> > > >>> but within FFmpeg indexes is much more widespread.
> > > >>>       
> > > >> Does it matter if both are used?  Pointless changes like this make svn
> > > >> blame less useful.
> > > >
> > > > Depends what you care about.  I do somewhat care about spelling
> > > > consistency, but of course this is not particularly high priority.  But
> > > > I also do not mind stepping through a few iterations in svn blame...
> > > 
> > > and do you care about people feeling the other way ?
> > 
> > That's kind of a loaded question.  
> 
> > Prior to other people voicing their
> > opinions, I cannot read their minds.
> 
> Iam glad to hear that you can do afterwards ;)
> 
> and
> Prior to the commit other people could not read your mind, thus "could not"
> voice their oppinion.

It just did not occur to me prior to committing. Anyway, the issue is
very minor IMO, yet I sense a big bikeshed nearby...

Diego