[FFmpeg-cvslog] r17152 - in trunk: MAINTAINERS libavcodec/Makefile libavcodec/vdpau.c libavcodec/vdpauvideo.c libavcodec/xvmc.c libavcodec/xvmcvideo.c

[Ivan Kalvachev]

On 2/11/09, Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 05:00:51PM +0200, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
>> On 2/11/09, Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:06:30PM +0200, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
>> >> On 2/11/09, diego <subversion at mplayerhq.hu> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Log:
>> >> > Rename vdpauvideo.c --> vdpau.c and xvmcvideo.c --> xvmc.c to better
>> >> > fit
>> >> > the general libavcodec naming structure.
>> >>
>> >> Revert that immediately
>> >
>> > Stop trolling already, there are people around here trying to get work
>> > done.  All you do is make other people's life's harder when you feel
>> > they are invading your territory.  You are neither acting rationally,
>> > nor being in any way constructive.  You just oppose any of my actions
>> > out of principle because you think I am a force of evil that must be
>> > stopped.  Stop this personal vendetta for good.
>>
>> You ignored all my explanations for the current naming.
>> You ignored my proposition for a better name.
>> You didn't even reply on my mail.
>
> Mans replied, that was plenty.  My patience is limited and as is plain
> to see, I have of other work to do that is keeping me busy.  Constructive
> work that will bring us some good in the form of a release.
> Can you claim the same?
>
>> > At least two devs are explicitly in favor of this, only you are against
>> > it.  We requested a similar change from Gwenole Beauche during the vaapi
>> > review process.  It would be hypocritical to request changes from patch
>> > submitters that we are unwilling to make on FFmpeg itself.
>>
>> The two devs are you and Mans. I refuted mans' logic for these changes.
>
> You refuted nothing.  One simply gets tired of replying to you over and
> over again.  You will not give in anyway, since I am at the other side of
> the table.  So why bother?

So, why bother with reviewing patches at all?

No really. If you think I am unfair to you, why don't you take
somebody I respect for arbiter?

This project have active Project Leader that is the only competent person
to overrule (unreasonable) maintainer decision. Or have Mans took that role too?