[FFmpeg-cvslog] r17960 - trunk/libavcodec/xvmc.h

The Wanderer inverseparadox
Sun Mar 15 14:17:22 CET 2009


M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:

> Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> writes:
> 
>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:32:10PM +0000, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>> 
>>> diego <subversion at mplayerhq.hu> writes:

>>>> +        All blocks before this one have already been claimed by placing their
>>>> +        position into the corresponding block description structure field,
>>>> +        that are part of the mv_blocks array.
>>> 
>>> FWIW, I can't make heads or tails of that sentence.
>> 
>> Are you referring to Ivan's or my version?  Do you think the new
>> version is an improvement?
> 
> Yours is better, but it still doesn't make sense.  I can't suggest an
> improvement because I don't understand what it's trying to say.

I'm not positive I understand it either, but from a first glance, would
"which is part of" be better?

Though that still leaves the question of either how it is possible for
multiple blocks to have a single position, or how it is possible for
multiple positions to be stored in a single field...

-- 
       The Wanderer is now caught up on -cvslog, but not on -user or 
-devel...

Warning: Simply because I argue an issue does not mean I agree with any
side of it.

Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny.




More information about the ffmpeg-cvslog mailing list