[FFmpeg-cvslog] r23904 - in trunk: cmdutils.h libavcodec/aac_parser.h libavcodec/ac3.c libavcodec/ac3.h libavcodec/ac3_parser.h libavcodec/ac3tab.c libavcodec/allcodecs.c libavcodec/alsdec.c libavcodec/avcodec.h l...

Baptiste Coudurier baptiste.coudurier
Fri Jul 2 21:25:02 CEST 2010

On 7/2/10 6:26 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 05:44:22PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 04:16:49PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 12:34:48AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>>>> On date Wednesday 2010-06-30 22:00:01 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 09:08:04PM +0200, Vitor Sessak wrote:
>>>>>> On 06/30/2010 08:55 PM, Alex Converse wrote:
>>>>>>> 2010/6/30 M?ns Rullg?rd<mans at mansr.com>:
>>>>>>>> Michael Niedermayer<michaelni at gmx.at>   writes:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 06:46:05PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Michael Niedermayer<michaelni at gmx.at>   writes:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 05:38:06PM +0200, mru wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>>   Would you let Diego dictate rules for
>>>>>>>> your asm code?  Didn't think so.  Now please allow the experts in each
>>>>>>>> area to do their job.  Your expertise is in writing fast C code, not
>>>>>>>> in English grammar.
>>>>>>> This is probably the wrong place to weigh in, but as a native English
>>>>>>> speaker I agree with M?ns here.
>>>>>> As a non-native speaker (we are the majority here, no?), I am strongly
>>>>>> against adding more english-related red-tape for getting code committed.
>>>>>> Really, getting comments that use good wording and have no grammatical
>>>>>> mistakes take time already, having to avoid _correct_ grammar forms is
>>>>>> just silly. I'm all for consistency, but it has a price and here I think
>>>>>> it is not worth it.
>>>>> That's why third person should be avoided, too.  It's simpler to write
>>>>> in impersonal form.
>>>> I agree with the purpose of the commit, but the way it has been done,
>>>> in open contrast with the rules of this community, is deprecable.
>>> Dunno what you mean by "deprecable".
>>> I'll go on record now that Mans asked me before committing and I told
>>> him to go ahead.  A JFDI attitude is sometimes better than endless
>>> bikeshedding.  The problem about this particular bikeshed is that it is
>>> a revolution of the great unwashed against the experts.
>> i politely request that you refrain from personal insults.
>> There is no need to call thouse who disagree with you "great unwashed"
>> Didnt we had enough flaming already?
> s/great unwashed/less skilled/ if you prefer, no personal insult intended
>>> FFmpeg is not about democratic decisions.
>> It is. And it always was.
> Nope, it is not and never has been, no matter what you claim.
> [...]
> If this Doxygen issue was a democratic decision then it has already been
> conveniently settled and you should accept the result.  There was Mans,
> Alex and me in favor with you against and Stefano neutral.  You can count
> heads or you can weigh competence, either way, the decision is the same.

Right, in case you misinterpreted my line:
"I totally agree here, and I'm with Michael on this one, this commit is 
useless and clutter svn/git blame. I'm all for reverting it."

I wonder why you didn't count me on michael's side. Will you claim 
consensus again ?

Key fingerprint                 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
FFmpeg maintainer                                  http://www.ffmpeg.org

More information about the ffmpeg-cvslog mailing list