[FFmpeg-cvslog] r24260 - in trunk/tests: fate2.mak ref/fate/msmpeg4v1

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Sun Jul 18 19:08:45 CEST 2010


On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 08:39:40PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:20:20PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> >> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes:
> >> 
> >> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 03:39:54PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> >> >> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes:
> >> >> 
> >> >> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:34:39AM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> >> >> >> vitor <subversion at mplayerhq.hu> writes:
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> > Author: vitor
> >> >> >> > Date: Fri Jul 16 12:19:21 2010
> >> >> >> > New Revision: 24260
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Log:
> >> >> >> > Revert r24258:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Log:
> >> >> >> > Add msmpeg4v1 regtest
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Added:
> >> >> >> >    trunk/tests/ref/fate/msmpeg4v1
> >> >> >> > Modified:
> >> >> >> >    trunk/tests/fate2.mak
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > According to Mans, "make test" tests already msmpeg4v1.
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> Don't believe anything I say.  It was mislabeled, and is testing v3.
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> What's worse, the encoder or decoder appears to be quite broken, so I
> >> >> >> can't add a proper test for it either:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > i dont want to break peoples dreams and hopes but i do not think we ever
> >> >> > had a msmpeg4v1 encoder. I felt it would have been wasted time to write/
> >> >> > finish it. Supporting the later v2 and v3 seemed sufficient
> >> >> 
> >> >> So would you approve a patch to rip out the non-working encoder?
> >> >> We should either fix it or remove it.
> >> >
> >> > iam ok with removing the struct
> >> 
> >> And any code conditional on msmpeg4v1?  I see no point keeping that either.
> >
> > that code would be quite helpfull to someone who wanted to finish
> > the encoder and someone who wanted to do this likely would not find
> > it if its just in a distant past revission
> 
> Do you honestly think anyone will ever do that?

did you honestly think anyone would write a msmpeg4v2 encoder?


> 
> > we also could leave the struct and mark it with CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL
> 
> The code is sprinkled with if(s->msmpeg4_version==1) making all the
> working encoders slower for no good reason.

adding CONFIG_MSMPEG4V1_ENCODER && in them would be as easy as removing
them

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

The real ebay dictionary, page 1
"Used only once"    - "Some unspecified defect prevented a second use"
"In good condition" - "Can be repaird by experienced expert"
"As is" - "You wouldnt want it even if you were payed for it, if you knew ..."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-cvslog/attachments/20100718/932ce040/attachment.pgp>



More information about the ffmpeg-cvslog mailing list