[Ffmpeg-devel] reply-to headers and the mailinglist
Thu May 5 21:36:22 CEST 2005
Rich Felker <dalias at aerifal.cx> writes:
>> >> IMHO, the best is not to do any reply-to processing. See
>> >> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html for a discussion on the
>> >> topic.
>> > This is nonsense...without it everyone would reply off-list and spam
>> > us all.
>> It seems to work well on all the lists I subscribe to that don't mess
>> with reply-to. Any sane mailer has a command that replies in the
>> proper way.
> The point is that people won't use it. I (and apparently 99% of the
> developers) do NOT want to get personally-addressed, off-list mail.
After a learning period of about half a day, everybody seems to get it
>> > I vote for stripping all reply-to headers and then adding the list
>> > as the only reply-to.
>> Setting relpy-to to the list addrss only makes it difficult to reply
>> off-list, if that's what you actually want to do.
> Exactly. It's difficult on purpose. So people won't do it.
Sometimes an off-list reply is more appropriate. If it were a little
easier to do it properly, the list would receive less such noise.
mru at inprovide.com
More information about the ffmpeg-devel