[Ffmpeg-devel] Re: [PATCH] RTP/RTSP and MPEG4-AAC audio (Repost)

Romain DEGEZ romain.degez
Fri May 6 18:06:52 CEST 2005

Diego Biurrun wrote:

> Well, I can assure you that your chances of getting such a big patch
> reviewed are going to be nil if you don't play by the rules.  Why should
> anybody bother spending time on a review if you aren't even willing to
> make small uncontroversial changes?

Thanks for the fast reply.

I'm not sure to understand your sentence but I totaly agree with the fact that I
have to play by the rules and I will.
However this part of the code is pretty outdated so the patch is obvisously a
big one and is difficult to split.

The fact is that with Michael answer, I can't figure out what is "cosmetical"
and what is not :-/

Anyway I didn't intend to be rude and I'm sorry if I was.

What do you think I have to do for my patch to be reviewed ?

Romain DEGEZ
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20050506/11a45215/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list