[Ffmpeg-devel] Re: FFMPEG code a mess

Gábor Farkas gabor
Sun Sep 18 23:31:07 CEST 2005


M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> G?bor Farkas <gabor at nekomancer.net> writes:
> 
> 
>>Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>
>>>Hi
>>>On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 01:50:22PM -0600, Mike Melanson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Rich Felker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>No, you're just a baka who can't read code.. The reason it's
>>>>
>>>>	Maybe we're being too hard on the sciatl.com guy. Based on his
>>>>email and every OO/C++/Java FAQ I have ever read, I think a
>>>>complete OO rewrite could magically solve every shortcoming that
>>>>FFmpeg has. Indeed, it's high time for FFmpeg++.
>>>
>>>java solves all problems you never realized where there at all, and
>>>replaces them with problems you will never be able to forget
>>
>>;)
>>
>>please don't fall into the same mistake as the original poster
>>(he thought that OOP is the only answer. don't think that OOP is
>>always the wrong answer)
> 
> 
> OOP is sometimes quite useful.  However, Java is always wrong.
> 
now this is a message where i cannot decide if it is truly your opinion 
(as suggestged by the first sentence) or a joke (as suggested by the 
second sentence) ;)

if it's your opinion, why do you think that java's such a bad choice for 
an OOP language?

gabor





More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list