[Ffmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Basic H.264 encoder

Måns Rullgård mru
Wed Apr 12 23:15:43 CEST 2006

Mike Melanson <mike at multimedia.cx> writes:

> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> Hi
>> iam both happy and unhappy to see a h264 encoder being developed for
>> lavc
>> happy obviously as h.264 encoding is no doubt the most important thing which
>> is missing
>> unhappy as this will probably seperate x264 and lavc further over time which
>> is the opposite of what i would have hoped for ...
>> then again i wont accept or reject patches due to political reasons so if
>> your encoder is clean and otherwise fit for cvs ill apply it
> 	Have we agreed upon a new FourCC for this codec? I don't think
> 	'F264' is taken yet.

Why would it need another code?  If it's H.264 compatible, though not
complete, any existing H.264 code will do.

M?ns Rullg?rd
mru at inprovide.com

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list