[Ffmpeg-devel] Re: On2 vs libvp62
Thu Apr 20 05:22:04 CEST 2006
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:36:39AM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> bad it is. The reason bad closed source is perhaps more wide-spread
> is that behind a bad commercial product there is usually a marketing
> department that may be able to spin something that makes the product
> sell despite its flaws. An open source product is promoted by its
> quality alone, meaning that the bad ones won't be used by many people.
No, unfortunately "open source" has marketing departments too. Just
look at Xiph.org! Or an even better example: Redhat and all their
horrible bugware/bloatware (GNOME, gcc, glibc, ...).
More information about the ffmpeg-devel