[Ffmpeg-devel] [PATCH] wma optimizations
Sun Aug 20 22:51:04 CEST 2006
On Sunday 20 August 2006 22:46, Loren Merritt wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Aug 2006, Christian Iversen wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 August 2006 19:57, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 07:47:23PM +0200, Christian Iversen wrote:
> >>> So it's 0.1 clock cycle?
> >> yes
> >>> I somehow doubt that :-)
> >> heretic ...
> > Well... eh.
> > I'm just wondering why you don't count in, say, "12000 cycles"?
> If it is 12000, there's no reason to use dezi. But if the code being
> profiled is 10 cycles, then premature rounding adds an extra 5% error.
> Note that the timer routines measure an average, so its not guaranteed to
> be a whole number of cycles.
Ok, now I can see why you're doing it. Thanks.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel