[Ffmpeg-devel] [PATCH] MJPEG wrongly displayed with vertical YUV422
Sun Aug 20 19:23:49 CEST 2006
05/08/2006 00:26 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote/a ?crit:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 06:15:24PM +0200, Eric Piel wrote:
>> >PIX_FMT_YUVJ422VP is unaceptable, it should be called PIX_FMT_YUVJ440P
>> Here is attached a corrected patch which fix the naming. Sorry, I had
>> tried to find the real naming but without success... those names are
>> quite a mess for me.
>> >and such vertical subsampled format can pretty much only occur
>> >if you rotate 4:2:2 video, should we really support that? what about
>> >rotated interlaced video?
>> Well, every tool which support JPEG seems to support this format, so why
>> not ffmpeg? IMHO, even if it is not so much used, the simple fact that
>> it allows to display lossless rotated video is worthy. Adding support
>> for it in ffmpeg is rather simple (especially since the patch is just
>> there ;-) ).
>> Please apply,
>> Index: libavutil/avutil.h
>> --- libavutil/avutil.h (r??vision 5924)
>> +++ libavutil/avutil.h (copie de travail)
>> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
>> PIX_FMT_RGB24, ///< Packed pixel, 3 bytes per pixel, RGBRGB...
>> PIX_FMT_BGR24, ///< Packed pixel, 3 bytes per pixel, BGRBGR...
>> PIX_FMT_YUV422P, ///< Planar YUV 4:2:2 (1 Cr & Cb sample per 2x1 Y samples)
>> + PIX_FMT_YUV440P, ///< Planar YUV 4:4:0 (1 Cr & Cb sample per 1x2 Y samples)
>> PIX_FMT_YUV444P, ///< Planar YUV 4:4:4 (1 Cr & Cb sample per 1x1 Y samples)
> adding things into the middle of enums is not allowed, as it breaks binary
Ok, sorry I thought this file was only internal :-( So here is a new
version of the patch which add the definition at the end.
PS: sorry for the delay, please keep me CC'ed on reply as I'm not
subscribed to the mailing list!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2528 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ffmpeg-devel