[Ffmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Attempt image2 in watermark vhook
Tue Aug 29 14:20:39 CEST 2006
V?ctor Paesa a ?crit :
>> Guillaume POIRIER skrev:
>>> On 8/18/06, V?ctor Paesa wrote:
>>>> After five days with no negative comments probably next step would be
>>>> commit the patch, probably by the person listed in MAINTAINERS for
>>>> vhook/watermark.c :-)
>>> Could you please provide a sample commandline to test the behaviour of
>>> FFmpeg with and without your code?
>>> I'm not familiar with the watermak features of FFmpeg, so I'm not sure
>>> how to test your patch before committing it (even though it's very
>>> small, I just can't shovel every patch without some kind of testing,
>>> be it just a compilation test on a different machine that the one of
>>> the original dev)
>> ffmpeg -i infile -vhook '/path/to/watermark.so -f image.png' outfile
>> It should fail watermarking with png without the patch.
>> When patch is applied it should work.
> Correct, and, for the sake of completeness, GIF should not be broken
> by patch so
> ffmpeg -i infile -vhook '/path/to/watermark.so -f image.gif' outfile
> should produce same results with and without patch.
Ok, i've tried with this commandline:
/home/guillaume/Prgm/ffmpeg/vhook/watermark.so -f ~/Documents/7.15.gif
FFmpeg version SVN-r6123, Copyright (c) 2000-2004 Fabrice Bellard
libavutil version: 49.0.0
libavcodec version: 51.11.0
libavformat version: 50.5.0
built on Aug 29 2006 13:49:28, gcc: 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5)
Input #0, avi, from
Duration: 00:00:20.0, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 1202 kb/s
Stream #0.0: Video: snow, yuv420p, 688x576, 25.00 fps(r)
Watermark: There is no filename specified.
I guess I'm missing smth. I don't use the commanline tool "ffmpeg" so
I'm not familiar with its commandline. Maybe it doesn't work because I
More information about the ffmpeg-devel