[Ffmpeg-devel] [PATCH] video4linux2 input
Wed Feb 1 12:15:21 CET 2006
Luca Barbato wrote:
> Morten Nilsen wrote:
>> M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>>>> Umm, I don't understand this comment, what is "us"?
>> ?S then or at the very least uS :)
> ?s if you want to be precise, second is "s".
ah, yes, you are of course correct.. what was I thinking?
anyhoo.. I've seen uS used many times, it's a lot less obfuse than "us"
in any case.. but, assuming source files are in a latin encoding, ? is
fully available to use..
More information about the ffmpeg-devel