[Ffmpeg-devel] time for a release?
Mon Jan 30 22:50:30 CET 2006
Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 06:34:51PM +0100, Alexander Strasser wrote:
> > Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 01:23:02AM +0100, Alexander Strasser wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > + Specify --enable-static to build the static libs or --enable-shared to build
> > > > +the shared libs too. For only building the shared libs specify --disable-static
> > > > +in addition to --enable-shared.
> > >
> > > Why this strange indentation?
> > It is only for readability.
> Well, we disagree about this..
We probably just disagree on most things :)
> > > > @@ -1507,7 +1537,11 @@
> > > >
> > > > +if test "$lstatic" = "yes" ; then
> > > > + echo "LIB=$LIB" >> config.mak
> > > > +fi
> > > > if test "$lshared" = "yes" ; then
> > >
> > > I'd prefer if the LIB thing remained where it was, it would be clearer
> > > to me.
> > IMHO it is the other way around. At the position i put it
> > we decide what libs to put in, it is crucial for understanding
> > how the lib types get selected to be build. So if it is more
> > local it is easier to grasp.
> We disagree about this as well: No decision is made in the place where
> you add the check.
Well, i really don't understand what you mean here but there
are certainly more reasons why the move of that line was more
> > Maybe, but i agree it should not be done in this patch.
> I moved it to a saner place within the Makefiles, which improves the
> situation somewhat.
> Since this broke your patch I've fixed it up myself and will commit it
> in a few minutes. This gives me the added benefit of being able to sneak
> in a few changes to make the patch suit my taste better. I hope you'll
> forgive me for that :)
Well, i hate the changes :) Anyway of course i'll forgive you!
You are mostly maintaining the configure stuff now, so you make
More information about the ffmpeg-devel