[Ffmpeg-devel] Re: [PATCH] MXF demuxer
Tue Jul 18 01:32:34 CEST 2006
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> why are there so many tables? isnt one enough?
>> Hell, no. MXF is a bloated mess.
All MXF is based on UID which are keys of 16 bytes. If wish I could use
int128_t. I still can build a nice table of UID recognized and use
memcmp, do you think that would be cleaner ?
I just tried to factorize and only check of variable patterns.
> imagine when you click on a save button to save several hours work which
> you did in a video editor, webpage with a little gif anim or similar
> and suddenly the shiny GUI dissapears and the commandline presents you
> with a "assert(desc->sample_rate.num % desc->sample_rate.den == 0) failed"
> and all your hard work is gone ...
Hehe. I fully undertand the point here, but how this is comparable to
the asserts in mov.c checking the time_rate ?
Also about the assert checking bytes_num at the top. I have no type
bigger than int64_t in C. Im lost. I'll just stop using asserts for now
I think :>
Baptiste COUDURIER GnuPG Key Id: 0x5C1ABAAA
SMARTJOG S.A. http://www.smartjog.com
Key fingerprint 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
Phone: +33 1 49966312
More information about the ffmpeg-devel