[Ffmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Snow mmx+sse2 asm optimizations

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Thu Mar 16 10:47:24 CET 2006


Hi

On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:51:18AM +0200, Oded Shimon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:52:26AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 04:39:49PM -0500, Robert Edele wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 14:37 +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > patch permanently rejected i will not review it again, find someone else, its
> > > > too much work to review it over and over again just to find the same issues
> > > > 
> > > > Note, to whoever reviews it, check if all the issue raised in past replies
> > > > have been fixed
> > > > 
> > > As far as that previous bug goes, I accidentally posted an old patch.
> > > I'm sorry and I do understand that reviewing patches is very time
> > > consuming.
> > > 
> > > I've split the patch into pieces (at least 5), the first of which
> > > contains no asm. Would you mind forgiving me and having a look at the
> > > first piece, which sets up a snow.h and makes snow use the dsputil
> > > function pointer framework to access the three functions that are
> > > implemented in asm in the other parts of the patch.
> > 
> > ok, first patch looks mostly ok, iam not particulary happy about the
> > inclusion of snow.h in dsputil.h but i dont really care
> > as dsputil.h was never supposed to be a public header, so whoever
> > came up with that idea can fix the snow.h inclusion (installing snow.h
> > along with avcodec.h is not ok)
> 
> Ping.
> 
> Can this be committed?

yes, you can commit it, though it would be nice if the snow.h inclusion in
dsputil.h could be avoided


[...]
-- 
Michael





More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list