[Ffmpeg-devel] Matroska Patch

Steve Lhomme steve.lhomme
Thu Mar 23 15:15:29 CET 2006

Ian Caulfield wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>> Ian Caulfield said:
>>> Is it just me, or will the block_time < 0 always be false, as it's an
>>> unsigned value? (Obviously this bug isn't introduced by the patch)
>> No, block_time is signed.  It's the cluster time that's unsigned.  Thank
>> the matroska devs for this mess.  Was it really necessary?
> Sorry if I'm being thick, but isn't it declared here:
> +                uint64_t block_time;
> ... as an unsigned int?

Yes, but I was told to make 2 patches. And since one patch has to come 
after the other, I sent this one first...


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list