[Ffmpeg-devel] overall license review - adding proper license headers
Wed Sep 6 10:29:46 CEST 2006
On 9/6/06, Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> wrote:
> So what exactly is the license if libavcodec/i386/idct_mmx.c is part of
> FFmpeg? GPL? LGPL? LGPL with an extra clause? Which clause exactly?
> I haven't seen Michel make a crystal-clear statement yet and the note we
> currently have is so misleading to be downright wrong.
> This has practical implications as well. Is another option for
> configure needed? --enable-gpl and --enable-lgpl-with-strings-attached?
I'd say that since we don't have explicity banner that state the
licence, everything that needed --enable-gpl to get compiled are GPL.
That has the nice advantage to be very straightforward, and to LGPL a
whole bunch of code.
With DADVSI (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DADVSI), France finally has
a lead on USA on selling out individuals right to corporations!
Vive la France!
More information about the ffmpeg-devel