[Ffmpeg-devel] [PATCH] mjpeg cleanup and again interlaced fix
Sat Apr 14 11:10:49 CEST 2007
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 02:09:36AM +0200, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
> Compn wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:38:48 +0200, Baptiste Coudurier scribed:
> >> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:17:14PM +0200, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
> >>>> prog,
> >>> prog? you mean progressive, if so write progressive
> >> why ?
> > prog could mean program or something else?
> When subject contains interlaced and an interlaced issue is mentioned ?
I agree that prog is not a good variable name. Ideally variable names
should be understandable with minimal or no context IMO. 'prog' could
be program, progress, progressive, ...
Keep in mind that not just gurus like you (try to) look at FFmpeg code.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel