Sun Apr 15 19:55:24 CEST 2007
Rich Felker wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 06:48:00PM +0200, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>>> but it didnt help, you continue the same childish game now with the
>>> dv timecode patch and the drop timecode flag
>> I don't think discussing and exposing arguments is a childish game.
> The drop timecode thing is childish.
I think it is not. That feature is useful, and Im fighting for it.
> Michael is just trying to clean
> up ffmpeg and remove broken behavior.
I don't think it is a broken behaviour. Drop frame timecode is only
allowed for 30000/1001 framerate in the code and calculation of time
code is correct atm.
> and you flame again and again
I don't think Im flaming, Im discussing and arguing.
> without ever answering his question: is there any case where you MUST
> use this ugly 'drop timecode' feature and not a more correct method?
I don't know any more correct method, though Im interested to know one.
> I'm 99% sure the answer is no, and so instead of answering the
> question you keep dodging it and flaming.
I think Trent also exposed a correct and useful scenario.
Baptiste COUDURIER GnuPG Key Id: 0x5C1ABAAA
SMARTJOG S.A. http://www.smartjog.com
Key fingerprint 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
Phone: +33 1 49966312
More information about the ffmpeg-devel