Sun Apr 15 22:07:59 CEST 2007
On Sunday 15 April 2007 22:29:00 Rich Felker wrote:
> Sorry everyone for the hasty argument and flames. I'm not familiar
> with all the issues Baptiste and Michael are discussing, but I hope we
> can clear things up and lower the levels of hostility a little bit.
> As far as I can tell, Michael has very high standards for code that
> goes in ffmpeg, and also wants clean, general-purpose interfaces to
> the library rather than things that are very codec-specific or
> On the other hand, Baptiste seems to be working very hard implementing
> code to get done the jobs that he needs to do, and which may be useful
> to many others as well.
> While there may be a difference in needs and approaches, I hope that
> we can discuss like sane respectable people and reach not just a
> solution to whatever arguments are going on now, but also future
> direction and policy.
Well imho also regressions are worrisome, recently (at least for me) frame
rate detection and also audio bitrate detection got worse. Fixing regressions
would be a priority. On the other hand a fork might just make the whole
situation worse (unlike X.org fork from XFree86 where all-1 developers were
involved in the fork which is not the case here).
Life is a game, and if you aren't in it to win,
what the heck are you still doing here?
-- Linus Torvalds (talking about open source development)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel