Sun Apr 15 22:36:10 CEST 2007
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 04:14:32PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 11:07:59PM +0300, Ismail D?nmez wrote:
> > Well imho also regressions are worrisome, recently (at least for me) frame
> > rate detection and also audio bitrate detection got worse. Fixing regressions
did you submit bugreports about these?
> > would be a priority. On the other hand a fork might just make the whole
> > situation worse (unlike X.org fork from XFree86 where all-1 developers were
> > involved in the fork which is not the case here).
> The last thing a fork would do is fix regressions, I suspect... If
> there are regressions, they need to be fixed, and people (Michael
> included) need to be more careful about committing code without
> thinking about it thoroughly and understanding it.
the framerate detection code is pure heuristic guessing its proofable
not possible to find the correct base framerate based from the first
iam puzzled why so many people complain about it
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your
right to say it. -- Voltaire
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ffmpeg-devel