[Ffmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Print KB for 1024 bytes
Thu Feb 15 16:07:55 CET 2007
Michel Bardiaux said:
> M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>> This is only an informational message. The Y2k thing was never a
>> problem in normal situations. Why, nobody ever mistook a year given
>> as "75" for 1875, did they?
> Your're really serious? Then I hope you never write medical software,
> you would be downright dangerous.
I don't write medical software. I write settop box software for a living.
>> DAMMIT, WILL YOU EVER LEARN TO TRIM YOUR REPLIES?
> You placed this rant where it seemed to mean I hadnt trimmed sigs, but I
> had done so.
You're right. You had this time. Now would you PLEASE stop using that
monstrously long signature of your own?
> So you probably meant I had left in too much of Panagiotis's text.
> I did so to leave at least some context.
That part was irrelevant. If you're not replying to it, it's irrelevant.
Really quite simple.
mans at mansr.com
More information about the ffmpeg-devel