[Ffmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove PRI macros definition
Måns Rullgård
mans
Sun Feb 25 19:11:29 CET 2007
"Fran?ois Revol" <revol at free.fr> writes:
>> >> You won't get warnings, but you will get random stuff printed and
>> >> possibly crashes. These defines need to go for the same reason we
>> >> removed the intXX_t typedefs.
>> >
>> > Then don't use them !
>> >
>> > This breaks the BeOS build.
>> > Either put them back, move them to os_support.h with ifdef I don't
>> > care
>> > but fix this.
>>
>> I don't care how much you shout.
> That's not shouting.
> THAT IS.
This is too!
>> This can only be fixed reliably in
>> the system headers.
>
> error: portability redefined.
> Previous definition in http://dict.die.net/portability/
No, you're redefining "standards compliance".
>> To me, breaking the Beos build is a very small price to pay for
>> correct results on other systems. There are exactly 2 (two) known
>
> 2?
You and Cian Duffy.
>> users of FFmpeg on Beos. I'm sorry, but if you choose to use an
>> obscure system, you'll have to deal with the consequences yourself.
>
> different != obscure.
Where I'm from, 2 users counts as obscure.
>> The Windows users finally accepted that we can't be expected to fix
>> deficiencies in their system headers, especially when doing so
>> reliably is impossible. Now it's your turn.
>
> I'm not in the mood of even replying to this politely so I won't.
>
> Fran?ois.
>
--
M?ns Rullg?rd
mans at mansr.com
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list