[Ffmpeg-devel] [PATCH] actually here's one more
Sun Jan 28 03:52:47 CET 2007
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:25:47AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 12:08:34PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Hi again,
> > scrap the last email, here's one that includes another patch that wasn't
> > applied yet either, but has been approved .
> resubmiting several approved patches merged into one reduces your chances
> to near zero to get them applied such mails confuse the already busy few
> who do apply patches, its like people opening new bugreports which
> contain a list of bugreports which havnt been fixed yet
> a simply reply to the forgotten patch is much better (assuming you use
> a working MUA)
and as iam already flaming ...
dont use subjects like: "[PATCH] actually here's one more"
rather try one which describes the patch
think of poor idiots like me who look through a list of "open" patches and
they have such subjects
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
It is dangerous to be right in matters on which the established authorities
are wrong. -- Voltaire
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ffmpeg-devel