[Ffmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Partial port of ffmpeg to MS Visual C - and a note on the inttypes.h issue

Yuri Vilmanis yuri
Tue Jan 30 06:12:18 CET 2007

Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi
> On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 12:38 +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> [...]
>>>  - inline functions - broken (very): symbol exporting behaviour is the
>>> exact opposite of the standard. Upshot is, anyone trying to use (compile
>>> or link to) ffmpeg with a C99 compiler would appear to be in for a nasty
>>> headache at link time (someone using a C99 compiler might like to
>>> comment on this?).
>> iam not aware of any bugreports about this, not to mention iam not aware
>> of any difference betweem gcc and C99 about "static inline" care to
>> elaborate on this? we dont use non static inline or extern inline or anything
>> like that ...
>   As somebody responsible for a fully C99 compliant compiler I'd be very
> curious to find out more about the original claim as well.
This was taken from the gcc C99 compliance page at 
http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html, under the "Further Notes" section...

Here's some more detailed discussion on the gcc mailing list:


> Thanks,
> Roman.
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at mplayerhq.hu
> http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list