[FFmpeg-devel] Understanding motion vectors from ff_print_debug_info()
Sun Jul 29 11:11:37 CEST 2007
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Pravin Bhat wrote:
> # It looks like you have to divide by 2 (or a higher power of 2) the
> values in the motion_val array
> to obtain the true motion vectors. Why is this so?
> For example ff_print_debug_info() processes the motion_val vectors in
> the following manner:
> where shift = 1 + s->quarter_sample.
> The 'quarter_sample' variable makes sense. It's accounting for some sort
> of mode where the video is
> sub-sampled by 2 in the X and Y axis. But I don't understand why the '1'
> is added to 'shift' in effect
> dividing all motion vectors by 2.
Sub-sampling is where you delete some of the samples, leaving lower
resolution. That is not happening here.
Motion vectors are specified to fractional-sample precision, e.g a vector
of (0.5, 0) means translate the video by half a pixel (interpolating
between samples in the reference frame).
quarter_sample=1 means the precision is 0.25, and the alternative is 0.5.
The numbers in motion_val are fixed-point representations of those
> # For computing the 'mv_stride' variable avcodec.h suggests the
> following formula:
> mv_stride= (mb_width << mv_sample_log2) + 1
> While I don't understand why that '1' is added mv_stride.
Some internal code is simplified if we put a ring of dummy values around
the edge of the array, such that the left neighbor of the leftmost
macroblock lands in the dummy values rather than landing on the right edge
of the frame.
> What worries me is that the addition of that '1' is conditional and I
> don't understand when not to add that '1'. For example
> ff_print_debug_info() uses the following formula:
> (s->mb_width << mv_sample_log2) + (s->codec_id == CODEC_ID_H264 ? 0 : 1)
otoh, ffh264 uses some optimizations that require the addresses of
individual motion vectors to be aligned, and it doesn't benefit from
the dummy values.
> # Finally, is there any way to populate the AVFrame.motion_val array
> with the motion vectors without having the motion vectors visualized on
> the decoded video frame? I'm setting AVCodecContext.debug_mv = 1 to
> obtain the motion vectors but as a side effect that flag also draws the
> motion vectors. It looks like ff_print_debug_info() always draws the
> motion vectors when the debug_mv flag is set. It seems wasteful to have
> to decode the video twice in order to obtain the motion vectors and the
> video frames without the visualization.
AVFrame.motion_val is always populated, if the codec has motion vectors
at all. The motion vectors have to be stored somewhere, so there's no
penalty for exporting them.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel