[Ffmpeg-devel] swscale and 64 bit problem (mmx code)

Reimar Döffinger Reimar.Doeffinger
Thu Mar 1 20:50:26 CET 2007


Hello,
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:28:14PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 06:12:53PM +0100, Reimar D?ffinger wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:28:44PM +0100, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
> > > Reimar D?ffinger wrote:
> > > > Well, the non-SWS_ACCURATE_RND case is trivial to fix I think, see attached
> > > > patch.
> > [...]
> > > > -			chrMmxFilter[4*i+0]= (int32_t)chrSrcPtr[i];
> > > > +			chrMmxFilter[4*i+0]= (uintptr_t)chrSrcPtr[i];
> > > > +			chrMmxFilter[4*i+1]= (uintptr_t)chrSrcPtr[i] >> 32;
> > [...]
> > > Isn't uintptr_t optional extended type in C99 ? I don't have specs,
> > > but Mans said last time those types were optional:
> > > http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2007-February/052196.html
> > 
> > Well, I originally intended to submit this only for testing, not for
> > inclusion since it is a hackish fix. Though probably no worse that it is
> > currently.
> > Attached is an alternative, since we can only support up to 64 bits that
> > way anyway, not using a *ptr_t type isn't a real loss.
> 
> looks ok

Applied.
For the SWS_ACCURATE_RND case I think it might be best to either just
ignore SWS_ACCURATE_RND with a warning printed or fall back to the
non-MMX version for ARCH_X86_64. Opinions?

Greetings,
Reimar D?ffinger




More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list