[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] RoQ encoder
Sat May 5 10:35:43 CEST 2007
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 10:08:25AM +0200, Guillaume Poirier wrote:
> On May 5, 2007, at 3:00 , Rich Felker wrote:
> > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:57:35AM +0100, Robert Swain wrote:
> >> Out of personal interest and being a lesser experienced programmer,
> >> I've always been lead to believe that 'goto' shouldn't be used unless
> >> absolutely necessary. Grepping the FFmpeg source throws up far more
> >> results than I expected so now I'm wondering - why have you suggested
> >> the use of goto over something like a 'while' loop? If it's better to
> >> use a goto in some cases, I'd like to know when and why. :)
> > This is nonsensical dogma. Continue and break statements are exactly
> > the same thing as goto. Use whatever control construct makes sense to
> > the code you're writing. Inserting dummy loops so you can break just
> > to "hide" your goto in a break statement is ridiculous. If you mean
> > goto, say goto.
> > FWIW, goto is extremely useful for error case handling can cleanup
> > before error returns.
> It's maybe useful for the programmer, but it confuses compilers so
> that some optimization passes can't be performed on a code with goto's.
> Well, maybe not all compilers are like this, but i bet it confuses
> GCC, who's not the smartest compiler around...
ffmpeg contains a few gotos, can you point to one where the code would be
faster without the goto?
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ffmpeg-devel