Wed May 30 22:38:20 CEST 2007
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:30:57PM +0300, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
> 2007/5/30, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>:
> > Hi
> > On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 01:13:43PM +1000, mark cox wrote:
> > > Hi, on the mailing lists and in wmv2.c i found reference to j-type frames,
> > > but nowhere can i find where this name came from originally.
> > 'i' + 1 == 'j'
> > > A google search
> > > comes up with nothing. How do you know that j-type frames are called 'j-type
> > > frames'?
> > we dont, and they are also almost certainly not called j frames by MS
> They call them X8 (or intra X8).
> Kostya also said they refer to them in this way in the vc1 advanced profile.
theres a RES_X8 in the VC1 draft but thats it, no details about what X8 is
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Its not that you shouldnt use gotos but rather that you should write
readable code and code with gotos often but not always is less readable
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ffmpeg-devel