[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] socklen_t definition

Diego Biurrun diego
Wed Sep 19 17:37:08 CEST 2007

On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 08:56:39AM +0200, Fran?ois Revol wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:51:58PM +0200, Fran?ois Revol wrote:
> > > 
> > > <rant>
> > > 
> > > [ boring repetions of old arguments ] 
> > > 
> > > </rant>
> > 
> > Look, rehashing old arguments forever and a day is not helpful to 
> > your
> > cause.  On the very contrary.  I have personally come to the point 
> > where
> > I would appreciate if you could just add a [BORING] tag to your mails 
> > so
> > that I could easily filter them out and skip them.
> Now, I for once didn't start on it, and I know I'm too emotional, but I 
> do feel insulted when I see that kind of things. So I can't help but 
> make my point.

Yes, you did start.  You keep harping on about porting applications to
OSes or vice versa at every possible opportunity.  But we have heard
your point before, more than once.  Decisions have been made and they
will not be reversed, no matter how much or often you rant.  On the
contrary, people will get more bored and annoyed each time.

> But I suppose I should just stop wasting my time on it and send to /dev
> /null.

Yes, absolutely.

Please realize that I am not trying to insult you, your feelings or your
OS of choice.  I'm just tired, tired, tired of this useless debate and I
want you to drop the subject once and for all.


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list