[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] url_split() ipv6 support
Fri Sep 28 20:41:06 CEST 2007
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:51:13AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> and of, course, I think after clicking send...
> On 9/28/07, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 9/28/07, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> > >
> > > but this is significantly too complex for my taste
> > > why dont you just support the notation from rfc2732
> > >
> > > where does the other notation came from anyway? if its not in a rfc
> > > its not correct and i see no sense in supporting it that is unless
> > > it can be done naturaly with no increase in complexity ...
> > RFC 4291, Apache (as an example) supports them, also.
> This doesn't necessarily mean that I want it this way or another, I'm just
> trying to support the notation as completely as possible. If you think 2732
> is the way to go, I can just support that (i.e. the top part of my patch,
> before the dblcol/trpcol stuff) and I'll be happy just fine as well. Just as
> long as it reads ipv6 in some way. :-).
i want the correct official notations supported
that said rfc2732 and rfc3986 say [ipv6]
and rfc4291 has no match for URI, URL or resource so i do not think that
the other notations are defined in the context of URLs
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
When the tyrant has disposed of foreign enemies by conquest or treaty, and
there is nothing more to fear from them, then he is always stirring up
some war or other, in order that the people may require a leader. -- Plato
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel