[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Sechole in gcc 3.3+ and 4.*
Sat Apr 12 06:18:41 CEST 2008
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 03:02:13PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> If C meant this to be undefined they could have said so explicitly like they
> do for >> and signed numbers.
They do, over in "Terms and Definitions" (section 3) where signed
integer overflow is given as an explicit example of something that
causes undefined behavior.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel