[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH][RFC] -std=c99

Aurelien Jacobs aurel
Wed Aug 13 01:44:47 CEST 2008


Michael Niedermayer wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:20:06PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> > Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:47:54PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:56:12PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >> > 
> > >> > Most (all?) of the above-mentioned functions are POSIX standard, so
> > >> > there should be no need for _BSD_SOURCE.  If anything does require
> > >> > this, we should look for a POSIX alternative.
> > >> 
> > >> Ill try again with xopen and posix and without bsd
> > >
> > > done, the following works for me too
> > >
> > > lower values of _XOPEN_SOURCE fail with:
> > > ffserver.c:4474: error: ?SA_RESTART? undeclared (first use in this function)
> > >
> > > lower values of _POSIX_C_SOURCE fail with:
> > > libavdevice/v4l.c:294: error: storage size of ?ts? isn?t known
> > >
> > > Index: configure
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- configure	(revision 14508)
> > > +++ configure	(working copy)
> > > @@ -1827,6 +1827,7 @@
> > >  check_cflags -Wwrite-strings
> > >  check_cflags -Wtype-limits
> > >  enabled extra_warnings && check_cflags -Winline
> > > +check_cflags -std=c99 -fasm -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500
> > 
> > I'd just go with -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600.
> 
> why?
> Is there anything that has been added to them that we need?
> The whole point of my patch is to keep the set of dependancies for ffmpeg
> small.

I agree.

And in this spirit, have a look at attached patch. It restrict definition
of _XOPEN_SOURCE to ffserver.c. It also define 3 mathematics constants
which are not worth defining _XOPEN_SOURCE IMO.
With this applied, you can simply drop -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 from your patch.

Note that I agree with M?ns that the -D flags should be set unconditionally
instead of in the check_cflags.

Oh, and did I mentioned that I'm all in favor of this -std=c99 patch ?

Aurel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: xopen.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1039 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20080813/3889f138/attachment.bin>



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list