[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Port x264 SSE2 deblocking code to H.264 decoder
Wed Dec 17 19:21:50 CET 2008
> In such a case the existing functions should be fixed, not deleted.
Is someone going to volunteer to do that though?
By the way, this discussion is exactly the reason I was "whining" on
#ffmpeg-devel earlier. People can complain about me "not doing
anything," but when I actually go to submit the patches, this is
*exactly* what happens.
Next time someone gets angry at me for complaining about how hard it
is to get the simplest things committed here, I can just point them to
this thread and show them how much arguing it took to get two optional
functions added to dsputil--or perhaps how, despite so much arguing,
it ended up not being added...
I don't see how it's worth my effort to write even these trivial
patches if they do nothing but generate massive bikeshed wars over
whether it's a bad idea to allow *optional GPL code* despite the fact
that, clearly, nobody is willing write the LGPL equivalent--if they
were, it would have already happened sometime in the past 2 years.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel