[FFmpeg-devel] transcoding on nvidia tesla
Fri Feb 1 01:24:18 CET 2008
Dan Khasis wrote:
> The performance enhancements are 100% real. For example,
> http://www.o0o.it/pro/, shows that a Mac Pro with two dual core xeon
> woodcrests at 2.66ghz crank out no more than 60gigaflops. So a tesla at a
> minimum of 8 teraflops per pc is 130 times more powerful.
Eh, my new Mac Mini Core 2 Duo 2GHz takes, like, 5 seconds to switch
between 2 running applications. :)
> I'm not claiming this is my unique idea, but I'm not the only one who sees
> the benefits in doing something like this.
Interesting, the original poster proposes using it for decoding. Seems
like a pricey and overblown bit of hardware for the task.
> If it [tesla] wasn't that much higher in performance, I'm sure nvidia
> wouldn't have invested tens of millions or more into developing such a
> system, if it wasn't powerful. Also, ATI made an announcement to release
> something similar to tesla in 09.
So you're indicating that perhaps we need to at least lay some
groundwork for these architectural matters that are on the horizon?
> Additionally, everyone knows that GPU's have higher flops than regular
> processors, so it's a natural fit for video transcoding, hence offloading to
> gpu's that some people tried doing.
FLOP = floating point operation. Video codecs generally operate in
integer space. No matter; the hardware can probably do wonders with
integers, and with many more at a time than floats.
I don't dispute that the card has exciting possibilities. But it will
require someone knowledgeable, talented and interested to get ahold of
some hardware before this initiative goes anywhere.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel