[FFmpeg-devel] Filtering clueless-user spam from the lists
Thu Jan 24 13:16:16 CET 2008
Loren Merritt wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Rich Felker wrote:
>> I'm wondering if we could implement a few idiot-proofing filters
>> for the ffmpeg lists to keep annoyances down. Some ideas to
> While you're at it, how about [PATCH] with no attachments. If you
> don't want to reject such messages, at least give the sender feedback
> before someone on the list has to tell them they forgot.
Er... wouldn't doing this also mean rejecting messages from people who
reply to a patch, but do not attach anything?
The obvious way to avoid that would be to not reject [PATCH] without
attachment if there is also a Re:, but that would miss
forgotten-attachment posts in the middle of an existing thread.
My usual .sig is on vacation while I adjust to my new computer
More information about the ffmpeg-devel