[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] replace some static with asm_visibility or so
Mon Jan 28 21:01:58 CET 2008
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:57:16PM +0000, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes:
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:48:32PM +0200, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 15:52 +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> > I preempted something similar from happening by asking root to
> >> > close uotis ffmpeg svn account, which root did.
> >> >
> >> > It was not due to a quarrel between me and uoti.
> >> There was no reason to believe that I would commit anything to FFmpeg,
> >> and so no reason to "preempt" anything.
> > Well you ignore the mplayer policy, an unanimous request by the other
> > developers and so on. Thats evidence enough that you do whatever you like.
> > Iam sure you would commit to ffmpeg if you could and saw some chance that
> > you would get away with it.
> Could you please refrain from making such speculative statements?
Uoti made the speculative statement that there are no reasons. I just explained
Maybe i could have said it using different words, like:
"I think if you had reason/interrest to commit to ffmpeg and belived
noone would revert it, then a policy or the oppionion of the other
developers would likely not change your mind. After all they did not in
Now i agree with you mans, that the statement is still rude but my choices
are to either let the claim stand that there is no reason and my decission
was arbitrary. Or to lie. Or to say the truth, as rude as it may be.
I choose the last, if i offended anyone, iam sorry it was not intended.
But i dont see how i could reply truthfully otherwise.
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
I count him braver who overcomes his desires than him who conquers his
enemies for the hardest victory is over self. -- Aristotle
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel