[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] replace some static with asm_visibility or so

Balatoni Denes dbalatoni
Tue Jan 29 22:44:47 CET 2008


Tuesday 29 January 2008 19:10-kor Ivan Kalvachev ezt ?rta:
> Here I saw concerns about FFmpeg leadership. I think that the the
> facts speak clearly. FFmpeg at the moment is in peak form. The SoC may
> be the cause, but Michael reviews are what sets higher coding
> standards.

This is exactly one of the points I was trying to make earlier.

> About the grammar. There is nothing worse than making your best
> efforts to do something and then been ridiculed over the result.

Also well said.


ps: there is one thing about the high coding standards - I understand the 
need, however it would be great if in the first reply (or at least soon) it 
was made clear what is the needed minimum for svn acceptance. I mean it 
sometimes seems an endless process, when every review brings up new and new 
showstopper issues - I think it would be less frustrating to the contributor 
if all showstopper issues were made clear right from the start, it's also 
good for planning (for the contributor and everybody), to see clearly early 
in the process what needs to be fixed. just my two cents.

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list