[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Warn about PAFF & Spatial

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:45:16AM -0700, Serguei Miridonov wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 08:02:01AM -0700, Serguei Miridonov wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> 
> > > > If i knew where the problem is exactly i would fix it.
> > > > Besides i honestly dont care about PAFF & MBAFF at all.
> > >
> > > Michael, I do not ask you why just because this is a developing
> > > list. But could you please post a few links which you think best
> > > explain pro and contra of 24/p video? For me 60/i video looks
> > > much much smoother than 24/p. On TV or computer monitor -- does
> > > not matter. So,if 24/p is so good, what I do wrong with 24/p video
> > > captured by my camcorder?
> >
> > then use 60/p
> 
> Camcorder does not support that. So?

Complain to the company that made it ...

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

It is not what we do, but why we do it that matters.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20080723/9a684d5f/attachment.pgp>