[FFmpeg-devel] Darwin gnu99
Mon Oct 20 01:21:22 CEST 2008
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 22:13:29 +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>Michael Witten <mfwitten at MIT.EDU> writes:
>> On 19 Oct 2008, at 5:27 AM, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>>> Michael Witten <mfwitten at MIT.EDU> writes:
>>>> -check_cflags -std=c99
>>>> +check_cflags -std=gnu99
>>> Rejected. Please explain what breaks without any patches.
>> That language is a bit overly strong.
>It's pretty standard around here.
>> However, I wonder if I influenced this change, though I was
>> admittedly quiet on the subject; it would be nice to include
>> references to people that may have helped find the problem,
>> because it makes people want to find and report more problems.
>Had you bothered to explain what went wrong without your change, maybe
>someone would have fixed it sooner. As for attributions, you get
>credited if you send a patch that gets committed.
we do appreciate bugreports, especially with patches
the reason we thought it was a patch is because you sent it to
ffmpeg-devel. this mailing list is for development/patches only.
use ffmpeg-user to report bugs.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel