[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] libx264: support for BUILD >= 63

Stefano Sabatini stefano.sabatini-lala
Tue Sep 16 11:28:56 CEST 2008


On date Tuesday 2008-09-16 09:24:40 +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd encoded:
> Stefano Sabatini <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it> writes:
> 
> > On date Monday 2008-09-15 15:07:14 -0400, Daniel G. Taylor encoded:
> >> On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 22:55 +0400, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> 
> >> Hey,
> >> 
> >> > On Monday 15 September 2008 22:41, Daniel G. Taylor wrote:
> >> > [...]
> >> > > The patch looks okay but it mandates that ffmpeg requires the
> >> > > newer libx264 from this point on, so maybe a library version
> >> > > check is in order? What's the normal ffmpeg policy on this?
> >> > 
> >> > Perhaps, it is to projects using ffmeg? At least mplayer do version 
> >> > check for x264 in configure script.
> >> 
> >> I think I have to agree with Baptiste here because there is no API
> >> change in libav* and if you are calling ffmpeg as an external program
> >> there is no change either. This shouldn't affect you at all, and you
> >> should be checking the libav* versions if you are using them anyway. A
> >> change there implies potential breakage.
> >> 
> >> That said if you'd like to it's a simple #if X264_BUILD < 64 check to
> >> add to the file.
> >
> > While ifdeffery in libx264.c doesn't look like a good idea due to the
> > libx264 API instability, I think we could at least provide a check in
> > the configure script to disable libx264 if the detected version isn't
> > valid, looks nicer towards the user.
> 
> It's always been expected that uses should have a recent version of
> libraries they build FFmpeg against.  Testing every little thing would
> become such a chore.

We know which version we need, and a simple check in the configure
should ensure that the user is compiling against it.
 
> > And while we're at it we could assert(X264_BUILD == x264_build()) in
> > the init code (assuming that function is implemented).
> 
> It a little harsh with assert(), wouldn't you say?  In fact, this
> shouldn't be needed at all, assuming libx264 uses correct shared
> library versioning.

See my other mail in response to Dark Shikari, but I have not a strong
opinion on this, the configure check may be sufficient.

Regards.
-- 
FFmpeg = Faboulous and Frenzy MultiPurpose Ecumenical God




More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list