[FFmpeg-devel] Who is against GIT now?

Felipe Contreras felipe.contreras
Mon Apr 6 11:51:41 CEST 2009

On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Reinhard Tartler <siretart at tauware.de> wrote:
> Mike Melanson <mike at multimedia.cx> writes:
>> (actual hashes from my FATE code repository). So what should the main
>> page of FATE report regarding the state of FFmpeg code? That version
>> 6e6fc12c61446bfe8dff7ce3b50ebfe0b0835bc8 passed all tests but that
>> 8e1f4d881f813d7d2c67656868f39b46a98d320d had problems?
> I think a timestamp with the hash in brackets after that would be more
> helpful. the has could then be directly used for the 'git bisect'
> command.
> How about this:
> ?testrun: 2009/04/06, 10:43:23 UTC, revid: 6e6fc12c61446bfe8dff7ce3b50ebfe0b0835bc8

How about:
git describe --tags

In my git.git repo I get something like this:

Which means the last tag was "v1..6.2.2" after that there have been
412 commits, and the sha1 of the current commit is "8d6eafb" (not that
usually 6 characters are enough).

Felipe Contreras

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list