[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] fix speex sample

Baptiste Coudurier baptiste.coudurier
Wed Apr 8 22:22:21 CEST 2009

On 4/8/2009 1:09 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 10:51:02AM -0700, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>> On 4/2/2009 8:46 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 08:08:41PM -0700, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>>>> On 4/2/2009 7:11 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 06:09:15PM -0700, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>>>>>> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>> Then I guess you noticed how many bugs are rotting in roundup ? This is
>>>>>>>> becoming a nightmare and is really frightening. Nobody jumps in, and
>>>>>>>> this was proved by the last 2 attempts to organize a bug fixing weekend.
>>>>>>> i know and agree, you also remember i did occassionally in the past fix a
>>>>>>> bunch of bugs but ATM i lack the motivation, i know thats my problem and
>>>>>>> i should go and bang my head against the wall ;)
>>>>>> Well, yes, but it's not only your problem, I believe it is our problem,
>>>>>> and it would be nice if everybody could participate in the effort.
>>>>> fine but i have to check this with the insurance first, if they cover damage
>>>>> from a bunch of madman banging their heads against the walls
>>>>>> I was motivated yesterday night.
>>>>>>>> Now I do care and I proved it, so I claim that yes some changes my
>>>>>>>> introduce regression but these will be fixed quickly, I engage myself.
>>>>>>> i think the proposed fix is wrong and a correct one will not introduce a
>>>>>>> regression
>>>>>> Well, I still don't really see how and why, I've explained more below.
>>>>> iam not talking about "SoundRate UB[2]" but that:
>>>>>             else if(!strcmp(key, "audiosamplerate") && acodec && num_val >= 0) {
>>>>>                 //some tools, like FLVTool2, write consistently approximate metadata sample rates
>>>>>                 if (!acodec->sample_rate) {
>>>>>                     switch((int)num_val) {
>>>>>                         case 44000: acodec->sample_rate = 44100  ; break;
>>>>>                         case 22000: acodec->sample_rate = 22050  ; break;
>>>>>                         case 11000: acodec->sample_rate = 11025  ; break;
>>>>>                         case 5000 : acodec->sample_rate = 5512   ; break;
>>>>>                         default   : acodec->sample_rate = num_val;
>>>> Yes, however I'm sorry, I don't see how this relates to the patch.
>>>> The patch makes the demuxer always set speex and nellymoser to their
>>>> correct _codec_ value IMHO, this "audiosamplerate" is a metadata thing
>>>> according to the specs, defined with onMetadata mechanism.
>>> I agree but then there would be no point to even decode audiosamplerate
>>> and i suspect there was some sense in this, i just dont remember it now
>> Any update on this ? It would be nice to fix bugs ;)
> no update, iam still waiting for someone to post a corrected patch
> The samplerate as set a few lines above is incorrect, i suspect fixing that
> will fix the problem
> also a function with the name "flv_set_audio_codec" has no business setting
> the samplerate, this should be split out and run seperately when needed

Renaming the function to "set_audio_codec_params" is ok, codec_id is a
codec parameter.

I guess we differ on the idea of "maintainership", but that's all right
with me. Let's wait a few months ;)

Baptiste COUDURIER                              GnuPG Key Id: 0x5C1ABAAA
Key fingerprint                 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
checking for life_signs in -lkenny... no
FFmpeg maintainer                                  http://www.ffmpeg.org

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list