[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] fix speex sample

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Thu Apr 9 15:48:05 CEST 2009

On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 09:33:26AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 06:30:56PM -0700, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
> Now while we're speaking of maintainer duties...  I agree with your
> position much more than I agree with Michael's, but I have to point out

i think we should clarify once and for all what duties a maintainer has
because people apply worse than double standards here
and because this is a matter very critial to keeping the project functioning

Theres no question that until recently a submited patch was reviewed,
and when suggestions for improvments where provided, the patch author
then had to fix the patch if he wanted it in svn or explain why the
suggestions where undesireable.

Do you propose that maintainers should fix patches themselfs now?
Or do you propose that patches failing review should still be commited?
Or do you propose not to review patches?

If none of above, then where do you disagree with me?

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

While the State exists there can be no freedom; when there is freedom there
will be no State. -- Vladimir Lenin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20090409/66ca2d7d/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list